Thursday, May 14, 2015

High Standard Victor

The Victor (or Supermatic Victor), first appeared in High Standard’s .22LR target pistol lineup with the 104 Series in 1962. The Victor in its final configuration continued in production until the very end, up to the collapse of High Standard in 1984.

It was based on their military frame, and as such, had appeal to those in military marksmanship units of the day. The line of thinking was much like ours today with using 1911 .22 conversion units.

The slab-sided barrel, under barrel weight and sighting rib gave it a unique profile, an appearance that I find visually pleasing. It just looks like an American target pistol.

Possibly one of the most unique items to the pistol’s design was its sight rib. They were configured with or without ventilation cuts and could be ordered in either steel or aluminum. And at times the rib deck could be found crafted flat with a matte finish or have multiple in-line ball cuts.

The adjustable sights were integral with the rib. That somewhat solved the problem HS  had with prior models using a front sight dovetailed into the barrel and the rear sight mounted on a steel bridge that was attached to the frame; there was always a fear the two sights wouldn’t realign repeatedly with the older models until the Victor’s sight rib was introduced.
From its early beginnings until the last few years of its production, the pistol had a takedown button like the prior generation of HS target pistols. Near the end of its production life the button was replaced by a hex screw, as an accommodation to manufacturing economy. 

The transition from button to hex screw might have been an unintentional improvement. After prolonged shooting it would become extremely difficult to release the barrel when using the button, it simply got tighter. I’ve been told numerous times by friends how they needed to take a rubber mallet or the edge of a wood workbench as a tool to force the button in.

For those of you who have never handled this pistol, the factory stippling on the front and rear straps are simply gorgeous. It’s classic small crater point stippling. It wasn’t stamped out by a machine process; a technician took a single point stippling tool and a mallet, and then drove each point home one at a time. Whereby the demonstrated craftsmanship of those completed stippled areas look surreally consistent. It’s a labor process that’s cost prohibitive in today’s modern manufacturing processes.

Even though the Victor had great accuracy, felt heavy and was very controllable with its 46 ounce (empty) weight—it unfortunately had a few design problems that could leave a shooter flatfooted on the line.

HS’s magazines are legendary and the Victor suffered because of it. I wouldn’t be at all surprised most of you are well aware these mags can be a little twitchy. The basic flaw is the gun has no feed ramp. During the feeding cycle, the bullet had to be pushed by the breech almost perfectly straight into the chamber. It’s not a small feat and I wouldn’t call it controlled feeding.    
So the practical aspect with the mags necessitate the lips be properly tuned to maintain reliable feeding. While at a match, don’t ever think of dropping one on a concrete floor because it’ll become toast.  
Since there is huge variance with the dimensions of .22 ammo, all mags pretty much had to be tuned to the brand of ammo a shooter wanted to use. Due to this it was extremely common for new Victors not to cycle right out of the box.

To complicate things further, secondary market mags appear to not have the appropriate steel or tempering to allow proper lip tuning. A common complaint is once one of these mags is tuned it wants to return to its original shape.  The basic dimensions should be .230 inch wide for the rear of the front lips and .185 inch wide for the front of the rear lips. The front and rear lips should also be kept parallel as much as possible.
The Victor had a deservedly good reputation for accuracy, performance and was considered HS’s best high-end target pistol. From a historical perspective, the Victor dominated the Nationals at Camp Perry throughout the 1970s by many shooters who we revere today as legends. It was the pistol everyone had to have.

Wednesday, May 06, 2015


About a year and a half ago, the NRA’s Competitive Shooting Division rolled out new shooting divisions: Metallic and Production. Someone had a great idea to attract new shooters to our sport: people who already own pistols that weren’t classic bullseye guns, and they could readily join us.

It kind of makes sense. There are millions of people who own non-bullseye pistols, many of which were recently purchased. Today a lot of these arms collect dust by siting in confinement, buried deep on someone’s closet shelf—under who knows what.  The flood of new pistol buyers really ramped up just before the 2008 presidential election and hasn’t abated one little bit by my obviation.

Two years ago when this idea was floated, no one gave much thought about how any of this was going to be implemented.  Match directors wondered how to stage, solicit, operate and report such new events. At the time it kinda looked like someone had a good idea, and thought they’d throw clumps of mud on the wall to see what would stick.

The process of implementing new divisions was heaped upon match directors with little care, who were then left to their own devisees.

For the past month or so before the Nationals were available for sign-ups, quite a few bullseye shooters expected massive changes to the match program to accommodate the new divisions. Well, they’re not there. And the program pretty much looks like prior year programs.

For a select few, some have been attempting to enter the new divisions at a high performance level. And they’ve been sorely disappointed because their opportunity to excel has been ignored. On one hand I don’t blame them.
But on the other hand, there doesn’t seem to be a burning interest within the traditional community to embrace these new divisions.  
Last year I shot one metallic division match. It was a 2700 and everyone shot open sights throughout the entire course. Aside from the fact it was really fun and different, the match director chose to hold a single division event. I honestly don’t believe the NRA had this in mind. My guess is they wanted these divisions to operate simultaneously throughout all or most matches. Thankfully the NRA has given match directors discretion, the option, of whether or not to embrace these new changes.
It comes down to communication. … Maybe lack of communication might be a better way to express it. Presently there doesn’t appear to be a plan to implement these new programs at the local level and at the National Matches as well.

The process of creating new divisions and how they weren’t implemented at all concerns me. Potently they may never take hold.
Conceptually these new divisions make a lot of sense with the Association’s desire to cross-market to new shooters. But someone’s got to get procedures to work before new people are invited to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the rest of us.  If not, we’ll be wasting our time by watching all kinds of transients churn through our matches.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Future Potential

Several weeks ago a post on Gun Nuts Media’s blog, writer Caleb suggested our sport still reigns supreme among the pantheon of pistol shooting disciplines. If you’re one of the five or six people who haven’t read it, here’s a link.

Given the limitations of any blog post, Caleb did an excellent job of reminding many of us about how special we really are. His post was passed around just about everywhere. Other bloggers reposted it, FB sucked down some bandwidth, and most of the people I know in the sport felt compelled to make a comment about the merits of this piece.
Why not? It was positive, upbeat and validated what an awful lot of us wanted to hear.
Caleb did make some muddled but endearing observations about bullseye relative to other pistol disciplines.  Let’s face it, most of us have a deep respect for not only our sport but its traditions and history. Me, I’ve always thought bullseye was the most pure of all the pistol sports; it’s the most difficult discipline to master, while attempting to progress it’s demanding as hell, and we have a vibrant history. We’ve got a lot of good things going our way.

Simply stated, we have great traditions that run very deep within our community. We revere our sport.
But it begs a few questions: Why does everyone else in the other pistol communities believe we’re no longer relevant? And why is there this illusion we barely exist, except in some remote backwater ever so cloistered from the rest of the world? 
To answer the first question, the current media environment might have a lot to do with it. Video has always been a constantly evolving landscape. But in the last ten years manufactures, suppliers and anyone else who furnishes the wants and needs to the shooting communities have heavily relied on Cable Television to sell their wares.  
I don’t buy into idea the Run and Gun guys made or forced their sport to favor video consumers.
I only wish those in the gun industry would kindly be aware that for every three-gun shooter there’s several  thousand casual targets shooters, possibly a lot more.  They’re the people who live down the street and on occasion grab their guns, get some ammo, and head out to their local club to shoot at stationary targets. If they’re using a pistol, they’re applying the basic elements of bullseye.  

That’s a huge market. It’s gigantic. One in which we could play a major role because all of these casual target shooters are emulating us, whether they know it or not. The economic potential is so vast suppliers would be foolhardy to ignore it.
What about the second question?
As a practitioner of this sport, my basic assumption is we’ve been around for so long, we’re simply taken for granted. For the better part of a century the civilian public has been shooting bullseye. And in its current form, pretty much in the same format since the early 1950s.
All sports evolve overtime. Think of it this way, when you look at any of the classic Olympic sports all have changed from their beginnings. Whatever the drivers or motivators for these changes, be it technology, media involvement or the demands of competitors—they’ve all changed.
For close to 60 years, except for modest equipment changes our game really hasn’t.
On one hand that’s a positive thing with its elements of tradition that I mentioned earlier. But on the other hand, it’s allowed us to be passed over by the other pistol sports regardless how sparsely attended they truly are. Heck, just look at the low attendance at the Bianchi Cup with its massive cavalcade of almost nonstop issuances of prizes and awards. 
I don’t begrudge the sponsors of the Bianchi Cup and their success. Good for them! If anything I’m impressed. In fact, our friend Tom Hughes has been noted in other media outlets as the individual who singlehandedly saved the Bianchi Cup from almost certain extinction.
So, as we plan for our trip to Camp Perry this summer, consider that we might need to make some modest changes to our sport for its health and ultimate survival.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Tom Hughes: Exit...Stage Left

Friends, it is with great reservation that I inform you Mr. Tom Hughes has resigned as National Manager of Pistol Competitions at the NRA.

I can still remember when Tom signed on as National Manager a little more than five years ago. At the time, Tom was incredibly gracious with me and consented to a casual interview. Over the years I’d run into him at the Nationals. And once in a while we’d talk by phone about strategy issues relating to the promotion of our sport.
During his tenure at the NRA, Tom was credited by many outside the Association to have single-handedly saved the Bianchi Cup. There’s a lot of truth to that claim. Granted it’s not our discipline but by 2010 the Bianchi Cup had declined to such a point it had become almost irrelevant; it was on life-support with only a handful of competitors. It had become little more than the walking dead.  

Yes, Tom worked tirelessly to snag as much media as possible, gathered sponsorship monies and promoted this event to a new generation of action shooters.  This man knows the value of good vision, provided someone’s ready to roll up their sleeves and work real hard.  In Tom’s case he had to do both.
Possibly about a year ago, Tom and I spoke about his considerable accomplishments with the Bianchi Cup. Then I coyly asked him if he could do the same for our sport. He replied, “I’ve tried, they won’t let me. But I’m working on getting better sponsorship for the [Precision Pistol] National Match.”

I left his statement there, and didn’t probe any further. At the time it didn’t seem polite to push him to reveal who “They” were.  And I was a little stunned there would be any kind of resistance for making anything better.
For those of you who are match sponsors, it's been obvious over the past several years that Tom’s staff reflects his commitment to our sport. Members of the Pistol Division have been incredibly helpful and upbeat with a positive can-do attitude.
Please don’t think I want to put words in Tom’s mouth, I don’t. My casual observation has been he had reasonable and productive ideas that would have transformed and enhanced our sport; on several occasions he intimated others in-house weren’t interested in promoting anything. None the less, I’m speculating about my interpretations of these conversations, so take them for what they're worth.
I have an enormous amount of respect for Tom. He truly cared, worked tirelessly for us, made a real difference during his tenure—and asked for nothing in return except for the success of our sport. I see his departure as a substantial loss for all of us.
Whoever fills his post has got some mighty big shoes to fill.

Update: I really rushed to get this out. And I’m sorry for all the typos you had to wade through.

Friday, April 10, 2015

CMP’s Talladega Marksmanship Park

This past Easter, my son was gracious enough to drive me to the CMP’s new shooting facility in Talladega, AL. My wife and I were visiting him during the holiday and he only lives about half a dozen miles west of the range.

Keep in mind this was Easter Sunday and the CMP was nice enough to leave all the gates open—for whatever reason.  Please don’t think I had an escorted tour of the facility. I simply meandered through the property on my own.

Change is coming to our sport and apparently the CMP has the vision to proactively take advantage of and profit from this coming dynamic shift. After looking at the range’s basic layout, whoever designed it gave serious thought to not only the practice of various shooting sports, but accommodated the concepts of human comfort and traffic flow within the facility. It was obvious, the place was well thought out.

When you drive up the main road from the front gate, the feeling of being reborn into gunny heaven is pervasive. It was easy for me to daydream about being there two or three days a week throughout the summer. It’s one of the few ranges that I’ve visited that wasn’t pieced together over the years.
The clubhouse sits atop the highest point of the CMP’s 550 acre property. When standing beside this modern and tastefully styled structure, most of the shooting ranges can be seen simply by looking down and scanning the horizon 220 degrees. 
Their grand opening is scheduled for the first week of May. Since I scurried through property just a few days ago, it’s obvious they have a lot of little detail work to accomplish. Although, it appears that most of the shooting facilities’ structural, civil, mechanical and scoring devises appear to be installed and up and running.

I’m gonna guess this will become a premier destination for many shooters in the not so distant future, regardless of their shooting discipline. Given time, I’m certain new history will be forged in the hills of Talladega.  

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

A Little Training for Sustained Fire

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard this, but there’s an old saying in the sport: “A match is won during slow fire and lost during rapid fire.” It’s one of those Yogi Berra sayings, flawed in its delivery but nailed down long before the last word is uttered. He really liked to play with the obtuse and then deadpan the obvious.

No matter how you slice it, competitive shooters need every single point they can lay their hands on.  And giving points up on the backend doesn’t get anyone anywhere. If you can’t master with confidence the backend of a match, don’t expect a new rating card anytime soon.
Most new shooters believe the slow fire stage to be the most challenging part to master in our sport. It is one of the more difficult things to master, especially those who attempt to score in the mid-90s consistently. Many times those same new shooters—once mastering those skills—become lulled into a false sense of achievement.
What it really comes down to is you need every single point that can be snagged. Your final aggregate score will clearly be dependent on the backend of the match, just as much as in the beginning. If you’re shooting in the mid-90s with your rapid and timed fire targets, please don’t assume you’ll just get better over time. The rapid fire portion in my opinion is the most difficult phase to perform.

Take caution when trying the drills noted below. All drills require training and its related but necessary time.  Nothing is simply going to be handed to you. Don’t inset a new technique into your routine during a match until you’re confident that it’s helpful and productive. 

• I firmly believe that an immediate breaking shot as the target turns is incredibly useful. About a quarter of a second after the target turns the shot should break. Many advanced shooters claim they’ll start to apply trigger pressure once they notice any target movement or expectation of seeing the target’s full face. This leaves you with nine, almost ten seconds for the remaining four shots. Two second one shot drills are the way to accomplish this skill. 

• Learn to keep the trigger depressed in the frame after the shot breaks. In this environment the first shot has been released, the hammer is locked back and the disconnector hasn’t reset. Hold the trigger in while you’re reacquiring the sight picture and as you make a commitment to manage the trigger. Then slightly release the trigger only enough to allow the disconnector to engage. Allow your finger to travel no farther forward while maintaining positive trigger pressure.  When you’re methodically prepared to release the next round, re-pull the trigger. Many will notice the pre-travel will have been substantially eliminated and the remaining amount of trigger weight will feel very light. It’s so light it can become extremely easy to release the next round unintentionally. For some, it’s way too easy. On occasion the gun may get away from you. To the uninitiated it might appear that you’re having an untended double. It takes a little practice. Take the time to dry fire using this method (after the gun has been cleared of ammunition) by depressing the trigger as far back as possible, rack the slide, and then ever so slightly release enough weight to feel and hear the click of the disconnector engaging. Now you’re ready to release the dry round. …  And as an added benefit this technique will help to promote a consistent grip throughout the string.
• During a TF or RF string, learn how to abort a shot during sustained fire. Assuming the first shot was accurately and quickly executed, we have time. And if your sight alignment doesn’t look almost perfect—slightly steer the gun away (out to the 6 or 7-ring) and start over again. Good Lord, don’t get all caught up in the mental clutter of needing good rhythm, that’ll arrive by itself from good shot execution. Be more concerned about “not giving up on the shot.” If you normally come down (or up for that matter) on the bullseye start over by replicating the settling in phase. Simply release the disconnector when the reticule arrives in the bullseye. Then go for a precision shot.

Many years ago I posted on how to use one shot drills, and in the process inserted a video boosted from the AMU. In its raw version it simply shows a shooter (from their own visual perspective) what it looks like to clean a rapid fire target with iron sights. Keep an open mind and think of what it would be like to shoot this target by using the three methods mentioned above.
It explains how some of those shots were executed so quickly and at the same time accurately. Even though you need to keep the trigger moving throughout the string, you can’t get the same results by simply pumping it.

Friday, March 20, 2015

Why Drills?

Just the other day a friend of mine asked for some advice on how to overcome throwing his first shot during sustained fire. Apparently it was a nagging and reoccurring problem.

It was a casual moment and I didn’t think much of it at the time. I’m not a coach to new shooters and certainly don’t hold myself out as one. So I simply rolled off the standard but typical answer, “Try shooting some one shot drills.”

I also elaborated that it’s useful to avoid trying to make the shot absolutely perfect. It isn’t all that helpful and generally it screws things up. And I further elaborated, he might want to start pulling the trigger just as soon as the target starts to turn without visual confirmation of even seeing the bullseye.

Three days later I had a chance to watch him clean his first Timed Fire target during a league match. … Dennis was justifiably tickled pink; he had the courage to try something new and worked at it.

I was elated to see my friend accomplish a new skill set. And later, I and several others proudly signed his cleaned target.

The entire process reminded me that very few people actually do drills or train. Most seem to be lost in the wilderness by simply practicing.

During my time on the practice range I see so many of my peers who do very little to help elevate their abilities. I don’t know if they’re adrift, never sought guidance, stuck in a rut—or at the very least—play this game for a different reason than I do. Which I’m certain many do.

At 50 yards

New shooters who train and use drills force themselves up the food chain. They acquire confidence in their new abilities and have a better self image, not to mention they’re elevating their match scores in the process.

Training and drills are good things, right?

If you’re a novice shooter here are a few of the most basic drills to get you started aside from dry firing.

1) The Classic Blank Target Drill. This drill is all about trigger control. Place a full sized target backwards in the frame at fifty yards. You shouldn’t be able to see anything on its face; no bullseye or scoring rings. Then shoot 10 slow fire shots on it for a minimum group. Simply shoot at the center of the target. What the shooter needs to do is pretend they’re dry firing, but the gun’s LOADED. Every attempt should be made to make each and every release well executed.

This drill forces you to know what your actual spread is during slow fire. Over the course of several weeks, you’ll slowly start to see an improvement in group size. Don’t look through the scope during this drill, put it away. And if for some reason you can see a pattern while shooting, never start chasing holes. You want to walk up to the target to see your results.  

Compare with a repair center ... 93-2X?

A shooter who can’t manage their group size will never do well during slow fire. As well, it forces the shooter not to chase their shots or use Kentucky-windage. It reinforces the process of good trigger control regardless what’s seen within the sight picture.

By the way, this drill is so dull and boring its mind numbing. But, it works.

2) The One Shot Drill. As mentioned above one shot drills work handily for anyone not getting their first shot off timely and accurately.

At the 25 yard line, simply set the target timer for a 2 seconds face. Your mission is to release one round into the 10-ring. It should be done leisurely but without hesitation. Be emotionally prepared on the firing line but don’t force anything.

Sounds simple enough, right? Just keep doing it until you can shoot 10 consecutive shots, one shot at a time, into the 10-ring. And if you can’t, just keep at it until you can.

Expect to fail. But once you mastered this drill not only will your sustained fire scores increase, so will your confidence while on the short line.

3) Shooting Thru the Donut Hole. Regardless whether you’re using a .22 or .45 this drill enhances your ability to quickly get up to speed on the short line.

Cutout the 10-ring from several sustained fire repair centers. Then place one on the backer at 25 yards with a corresponding hole. Yes, daylight should be seen through the target. Then go about and shoot a turning target set. Aim into the open area in either timed or rapid fire fashion.

Your goal is to try and avoid hitting the 9-ring.

Most novice shooters are quickly surprised to find out the vast majority of their shots fly right through that big gaping hole. And it does look like a big hole by simply viewing it from the firing line.

Many shooters using this drill discover their skill levels are much better than currently perceived. And it’s a confidence builder that easily translates to future matches.

Will there be an occasional failure? Sure. But the shooter’s attention should be placed on how well they performed with most shots. Shooters who use this drill sometimes get a unique epiphany. [I won’t ruin it for ya. You’ve got to find out for yourself.]

Here are some final thoughts.

One thing everybody notices about drills is—they’re excruciatingly dull. You don’t get a score, there’s generally no exhilaration from an unusually well placed shot, and there’s no real immediate feedback.

Ah, but they do help. They promote good fundamentals whether you like it or not.

If you want a full-blown drill list, download the USMC Pistol Team Workbook. It’s basically a singular path laid out for novice shooters, where it’s nothing more than one drill after the other.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

A Crafted Bullseye Pistol

Over the years I’ve run into new shooters who’ve desperately attempted to economize on equipment, including their first wadgun. Even I tried to do the same thing about 10 years ago when I first started out in this game.

Typically many will attempt to purchase a used pistol. In some cases things work out well, and at other times it can turn into a disaster. I’ve seen it play out both ways.  If you’d like to see how I mismanaged things with my first bullseye pistol, click here.
So if you’re a budding Master Wananbe, and if your budget only allows for a used wadgun, expect there will be a time in the not so distant future where you’ll need to step-up and commission a gun.

In simple terms, if you’re actually determined to compete, you’ll need equipment that can perform much better than you. Because if your equipment is substandard you’ll never know your real potential; your shooting flaws will always be masked by the hidden failings of your equipment.
In such a situation, how would you ever know that you were out-shooting the gun? As well, you’ll more than likely screw-up your training plans and in the process ingrain bad habits. 

Stock guns don’t work for us. Typically a decent production pistol might group 6 to 12 inches at 50 yards.  Having a spread like this, it would take a miracle for a high level Expert to score 80 or better at the long line. Good results and scores are just not gonna happen—ever. If you want to put yourself in a box and become frustrated over a long period of time, a stock gun is the solution. 
All new shooters should be looking for a 1911 that prints at least a 2 inch group at 50 yards.
I should also point out that most (but not all) precision 1911 production pistols leave a lot to be desired. For most newbies the lure here is simply availability. They’re either on the shelf somewhere or only a few months away for delivery.
It’s not uncommon for one well known manufacturer to offer a 1&1/2 inch guarantee for an additional fee.  After 10,000 or so rounds, these pistols become infamously inaccurate.  Remember this about most precision production pistols: Just because a pistol is fitted extremely tight doesn’t necessarily mean they’re fitted properly. A properly fitted wadgun will wear over time but it will take a prolonged period of time before those actions transform into poor accuracy. Tight for the sake of being tight doesn’t get people a lot of mileage. Proper fitting by the smith’s skillful anticipation of normal wear is worth its weight in gold.
Do these production guns look pretty? Sure they do, but that’s more about the marketing department’s demands to provide implied or perceived quality. Just because something looks nice doesn’t necessarily translate into functional quality.
I’ve used such guns in the past. For years I wondered why they routinely needed to be sent back to the manufacturer after one and a half seasons of shooting; due to their ability to spray rounds just about everywhere.  Heck, all of these guns appeared to be tight in lockup when they were returned for service work.
One of the other important factors about a pistol that arrives from a dedicated bullseye smith is its shootability. That’s the pistol’s ease of operation. Granted, “shootablility” is an extremely idiosyncratic and subjective term.
For one moment think of a production house or local smith crafting a pistol with high quality parts. They fit them within the time limits available to them and by limited technical parameters. Generally these guns are not given the care or detail required, especially when we’re referring to the firing group as a whole.      
Did the smith actually parallel the trigger slots and then lap them? Were the bow and its tracks treated in a similar manner?  Did they even bother to actually fit the base of the strut? I could go on at great length about the required minutia to craft a sliding-on-wet-glass trigger pull. The truth is production firms and local smiths are either unknowing or unwilling to apply the required and necessary efforts.
Let’s dispel one more myth. Please don’t think you can pick up a Springfield or Rock Island Armory 1911 and have it refitted to be a competitive bullseye gun. First off, most reputable smiths won’t do it. Their reasons are basically twofold: It takes far more labor simply to manage an existing frame and slide rather than using high quality oversized parts; that pistol will never be truly fitted because it didn’t have a pristine beginning. And assuming it’s been welded-up, that pistol will likely have a short lifespan making the smith concerned about dealing with unwanted product returns. 

And let’s not forget about all those remaining original parts that are going to be (and should be) thrown into the trash.

Reworking a stock pistol has no cost benefits for either the smith or shooter in such a scenario. Although, there are individuals out there who will gladly pander to potential customers.
So what’s a newbie to do?

Well, money is always a legitimate concern. If you’re able, plan on purchasing the best that you can. By my last count there are only seven real smiths capable of crafting true bullseye pistols, and two of them aren’t taking any more orders.
Should you find yourself with limited resources buy a used wadgun with pedigree. And then have a bailout plan or consider your first purchase to be future trade fodder. That way, at least you’ll ease or avoid the feeling of buyer’s remorse.   
Do most of us buy-up at one time or another? Sure. Just be aware that it’s part of the game.
But you’ll perform better and advance faster with high quality equipment.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Korth PRS

About two years ago at a local gun show, I had my first face to face encounter with a Korth pistol.  It wasn’t new, but a lightly used 6 inch Combat revolver. None the less, there it sat, staring at me with its legendary beauty, radiating its assumed and proud flawlessness from the vendor’s table. Every so often someone else would ogle it, and their body language telegraphed an extreme sense of awe and wonderment. 

It looked like a work of art and was awesomely unique. By the way, the vendor wouldn’t let me handle it.
It’s difficult to be detached and impartial about anything that extremely expensive. There are those of us who are fans of Rolex, Bentley and Leica. It’s easy to assume Korth’s product line reigns in the same pantheon of other ultra-high quality consumer items.    
For me, it’s little more than a fantasy firearm. Not once did the thought of reaching for my credit card ever enter my mind; regardless of the fact none of them have a credit limit adequate enough to purchase one. Although like many illusory gunsthey really do existsuch as Holland & Holland express rifles or Fabbri double barrel shotguns.
Could you shoot Distinguished Revolver with a Korth Combat? As a production gun it’s legal but not very practical.
At the end of 2013, Korth announced their interpretation of the classic 1911 with massive modifications called the PRS.  I highly doubt John M. Browning would recognize his pistol with the possible exception of its general profile. After waiting many years, Korth finally rolled out a large bore semiauto based on Browning’s 1911 frame (sort of).  It’s intended to be a precision type pistol as opposed to a defensive or battle platform.
The heart of Korth's pistol is twofold: a fixed barrel and delayed roller locking system. Actually I don’t know from an engineering standpoint which came first, the fixed barrel or the locking system? Since “form follows function,” I’m guessing the locking system had to be crafted to accommodate the use of a fixed barrel.
For decades the search for an ultra-accurate large bore pistol, such as a .45ACP, was centered on the belief that a fixed barrel system would eliminate the problems of repeatability with moving barrel systems. The so called “tilting barrel” method appears to be a thing of the past for Korth. And over the years a lot of companies looked for similar solutions including Kimber, Hogue, and even our friend Ed Masaki. All of which is predicated upon the yet to be validated belief that a fixed barrel system will always be more accurate.
The roller delayed locking system is a mechanical technique that has commonly been applied in recoil based machine guns. And as such, typically they produce more felt recoil. So, there’s been a little give and take with its design. Although, one would guess that feeding reliability might be enhanced by using such a method.
The finish and fit of this gun is impressive. But once you understand Korth’s pricing policy I don’t know of anyone who would expect anything less. A brief glance at their webpage generally lists all their guns as POR.
Here’s the deal with pricing: They’re incredibly expensive, much like a Swiss watch. From others who have had direct contact with the company, pricing might range from a starting point of about $4000, and then quickly rise to about $15,000 depending on barrel length and requested amenities.

For the most part, it doesn’t appear that Korth has much in the way of idle inventory. Order one up and expect to wait four to six months before delivery. Consider them being made to order.

Please be aware even though Korth is technically a modern German manufacturer, a sizable amount of their delivered products are semi-custom crafted. The PRS shown above comes in barrel lengths of 4, 5 and 6 inch. And the 6 inch model is capable of mounting a modern optic for precision type shooting.  
Knowing Korth’s reputation, and given enough money, I wouldn’t be at all surprised they would gladly extend the front mounting rail (which is attached directly to the barrel) much further back over the slide, simply for the sake of balance.

For those of you who are familiar with Cabot Guns* and their Bullseye Model, be apprised these two companies wade into the same potential customer base. They don’t sell guns per se; they sell lavish artifacts with implied inspiration to a unique few who can afford the price without blinking.
To quote the immortal Sam Spade: “It’s the, uh, stuff that dreams are made of.”
Here's a Korth YouTube link for the PRS:

* The Cabot Bullseye Model is a limited production item not listed in their catalog, although alluded to in their press releases.  This model is reserved solely for members of the Cabot Pistol Team and a limited number of existing clients.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Repost: Calling Your Shots

Not long ago, a reader mentioned in one of my comment areas the process of “calling your shots.” And it dawned on me, since I’ve been writing this blog over the past three years I’ve not once mentioned it in any of my prior posts.

Shot calling is considered by many instructors as an advanced skill. Most of us do it without much thought, and as a consequence, do it poorly. As an acquired skill it’s extremely important to developing shooters. Knowing where it lands by reading the sight picture provides the shooter with immediate feedback about how well he’s performing and where he’s scoring. And there are other benefits.

1) Knowing when a slow fire shot is properly released and reading its appropriate response, provides fodder for the subconscious to ingrain a good shot process. And in doing so, hopefully a good shot can be replicated redundantly in the future.

2) Obtaining an accurate and immediate visual response from a poor sustained fire shot allows the shooter to abort during a sustained fire string and start over.

3) And if there’s a classic failure in any one of the fundamentals which you haven’t yet detected, a proper interpretation of the sight’s response may give you clues about what need’s your immediate attention during a match or live practice.

To start the process one would review their current dry fire drills. Generally, all shooters at one time or another will detect errors with their grip or trigger control. Obviously this is the foundation for any type of shot calling. Special attention should be applied to the time just prior to the hammer strike, when the hammer strikes and the moment immediately there after during the follow through period. Knowing what causes a jerked, heeled, milked or snatched shot—during dry fire—generally applies to live fire as well.

Although, during live firing training there are two basic drills that will help most shooters to become more attuned to the shot calling process.

The first will require assistance from a friend. At the range a shooter would go through their normal shot plan and on a slow fire basis without a scope or other aid, shoot a shot, make a call to its location, then verbally call out the round’s printed location on the target to their friend. The shooter’s friend, who is out of view, would mark an identical type target located on the bench where the shooter had called the shot. Then the assistant would scope the actual shot, verify its location and mark its location using a different color pen. One pen color for the called shot, and a different one for the shot’s actual location. Ideally all of the shots called and their separate verified locations should be numbered in sequential order.

During this exercise I’d initially limit the number of shots printed on the target to around five. This is an attempt at keeping the last few shots fresh in the shooter’s mind. More than likely there’ll be ten different marks on the bench target, and it becomes difficult trying to remember what went where with large numbers of notations. After only a few shots, the shooter would compare his called shots with the actual scoring target by going down range.

A similar drill can be accomplished alone. A shooter would do the same drill as noted above but would leave his scope secured in the box. He would shoot the shot, call the shot, and then mark its called location on an identical type target residing on the bench. Later, he would go forward and compare the two targets. This drill is best left to more advanced shooters; there’s no opportunity for feedback from another person who more than likely has been watching your routine and release.

A fresh-off-the-boat novice shooter might be able to call (within one scoring ring) one out of seven or eight shots. Sharpshooters and Marksmen might be able to get a 40% to 60% percent success rate with Experts hovering around 70%.

The initial problem with shot calling usually happens because of the human element of mental timing. Visually, many shooters will embed that moment of the sight picture when they made their commitment to pull the trigger, as their called location. But the ideal image for a good call will come from the immediate follow through period. It’s not uncommon for shooters to fall into a “that’s where I want it” visual snapshot while going after the shot. And then have the subconscious erroneously validate the old ‘want it’ image as the point of impact. It’s the image during the follow through response that gives the most accurate call.

Remember, while using an optical sight you want to see the dot leap straight back at you, regardless where it’s pointed. And for open sights, it’s where you last saw the front post. The gun may or may not be aimed or pointed where you wanted but both confirm proper application of the fundamentals.

One of the initial and most common epiphanies many shooters have during these drills is they become much more aware of the break down in their fundamentals. So, when you use one of these drills you get double bonus points: the ability to call better; and hopefully increased attention to the basics.